c

EPHRATA - After setting its cryptocurrency rates in August of 2018, the Grant County Public Utility District is facing a lawsuit.

Mention of the lawsuit was made during Tuesday’s commission meeting in Ephrata. Utility officials say Grant PUD is being sued by nine cryptocurrency-related firms who allege Grant PUD, it’s commissioners and some employees acted inappropriately in creating and approving a new rate that raises electricity costs for them and other new “evolving industry” customers.

Starting April 1, 2019, high-power cryptocurrency miners and other comparable operations will pay the first of a three-year, graduated increase to a new, above-cost electric rate designed to mitigate Grant PUD financial risk and maintain low cost rates for core customers. Known as “Rate 17," its paying “evolving-industry” customers will receive a 15 percent increase in 2019, a 35 percent increase in 2020 and a 50 percent increase in 2021.

Since summer 2017, Grant PUD has received new service inquiries for more than 2,000 megawatts of power — more than three times the electricity needed to power all Grant County homes, farms, businesses and industry. Approximately 75 percent of those requests are from cryptocurrency miners.  

During Tuesday's meeting, utility officials announced that the PUD will cover cost of legal defense for commissioners Tom Flint, Dale Walker and Larry Schaapman, as well as former commissioners Terry Brewer and Bob Bernd, and ten PUD employees.

Commissioners Tom Flint and Larry Schaapman made the following remarks about bitcoin miners last year:

“Your industry is unregulated and high-risk,” said Commissioner Tom Flint to a handful of cryptocurrency miners who attended the August meeting. “This is the best way to ensure our ratepayers are not impacted by this unregulated, high-risk business.”

“I don’t view miners as villains,” Commissioner Larry Schaapman said. “You have likened yourselves to the data centers, but you can only do one thing — mine bitcoin.”

According to Grant PUD officials, “evolving-industry” firms present three main types of risk for Grant PUD:

Regulatory Risk. They are vulnerable to potential changes in regulation that could render the industry unviable within the foreseeable future.

Business Risk. They are an unproven industry with higher potential for cessation due, in part, to large swings in the value of their primary output.

Concentration Risk. They pose the potential for significant concentration of electrical load and revenue risk to Grant PUD if one or all stop operating in a short period of time.

Grant PUD released the following statement about the lawsuit on Thursday:

“With regards to the litigation we are aware of the litigation and plan to file a response to the notice of complaint in federal court before the end of the month.”

(2) comments

looktwice

The Amount of energy the Dams can generate is finite and with all the lost water to aid migrant fish we don't always have a stable supply of cheap power, the bitcoin miners provide maybe 40 total jobs and consume a large part of our power.
As a county we need to put our rate payers first, before you know it we will all be subsidizing the Bitcoin business, surely the millennial green party of Jay Inslee can put up a couple of wind turbines or a solar panel, or any of a number of Green solutions to help the important business of Bitcoin Mining

beaver152

The actual rate increase is closer to 50% the first year, 50% the second yeah, and 100% the final year. Rates would go from 2.8c per kw/h to 4c per kw/h to 8c per kw/h, while companies like microsoft etc, pay 3c per kw/h. Miners were OK with a reasonable rate increase, but 8c power is a about a 400% rate increase total not 50% like this articles states. This 'risk' is about 20mw total of the grant PUD power, that's about 3.5% of the total power of grant PUD. Not to mention, most of there 'larger' power users, are 40+mw in size (single customers) and 1 customer who was using 100mw of power, recently just decreased to 50mw. How is less than 5% of the power spread through 9 companies a 'risk' to grant pud? These miners were asking to be grandfathered in at current rate, or a reasonable rate, not a 400% increase putting them out of business. 9 companies represent over 40 full time jobs in grant county, Existing companies are OK with a rate increase on NEW miners, however, they have already spent millions in infrastructure, and if they had known the PUD was going to raise the rates on them, would have never built facilities and invested millions in grant county. Just grandfather them and raise the rates on new ones, at least then they can make a choice if they want to build facilities at these new rates (and they won't)

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.