Gun photo

Photo Courtesy: (Elaine Thompson / Associated Press)

SEATTLE (AP) — When lawmakers return to Olympia on Monday for the 2020 legislative session, they’ll take up a list of bills that aim to prevent gun violence, ranging from bans on certain types of weapons to an increase in training and background checks.

Attorney General Bob Ferguson proposed a package of legislation last month “to combat mass shootings in Washington state.” For the first time, Gov. Jay Inslee joined Ferguson in calling for a ban on assault weapons and limits on high-capacity magazines.

Ferguson also wants the state to require background checks for people buying ammunition.

“In 2019, we saw more mass killings than any year on record, many using high-capacity magazines and assault weapons,” Ferguson told The Associated Press. “We continue to see growing evidence that restricting access to high-capacity magazines and assault weapons will save lives.”

Dave Workman, a spokesman for the Bellevue-based Second Amendment Foundation, said gun-rights groups will be out in force to challenge any measures that try to infringe on the right to bear arms.

“There’s a tendency to demonize the gun and the person who owns it instead of the bad guy who commits a crime,” Workman said.

Kristen Ellingboe, a spokeswoman for the Alliance for gun Responsibility, said she’s hopeful lawmakers will support bills that have failed in the past. Washington state has a history of passing most gun-violence prevention measures through the initiative process after they died in the Legislature.

But things are different now, she said.

“In 2018, Washingtonians elected the first true gun responsibility majority in Olympia and we saw the difference that made last session when the legislature passed 10 gun violence prevention measures,” she said. “That’s evidence that our elected officials are finally catching up to the people of Washington state on this issue.”

The country saw a renewed push to ban high-capacity magazines after a man opened fire in Dayton, Ohio in August, killing nine people and injuring 27 others in only 30 seconds, in part because of the 100-bullet drum attached to his rifle.

By last fall, nine states had passed laws restricting magazines to 10 to 15 bullets. Similar restrictions are being considered on the federal level.

Ferguson and Inslee want to limit magazines to 10 rounds in Washington state. The bill makes exceptions for law enforcement, military and recreational shooting ranges.

They also want to ban the sale of “assault weapons,” which are defined as semi-automatic guns that contain at least one military-style feature. The measure allows for the possession of grandfathered weapons that were purchased before the effective date of the bill.

Sen. Patty Kuderer, D-Bellevue, will be the main sponsor of the bill in the Senate, and Rep. Javier Valdez, D-Seattle, will carry the measure in the House.

“On banning the sale of assault weapons, I’ll be candid: It’s going to be a challenge,” Ferguson said. “We’ve seen that the people are ahead of the politicians on this. I’ll keep fighting for it, because it’s the right thing to do.”

Workman said one problem with a ban on assault weapons is the definition of the gun.

Washington passed Initiative 1639 in 2018. The measure made it illegal for anyone under 21 years of age to buy a semi-automatic assault rifle. It defined these weapons as any rifle that reloads after firing a round when the trigger is pulled, as opposed to a gun that requires the person to open and close a bolt to reload.

Workman said that definition covers every semi-automatic rifle that’s ever been manufactured.

“You press the trigger, the action cycles, slides a new round into the chamber and you’re ready to go bang again,” he said. “It applies to millions of guns.”

Backers of the initiative appeared to be targeting guns that look like military weapons, he said, but instead they swept in most guns out there.

“They function like grandpa’s old shotgun,” he said. Any new legislation involving assault weapons will be impacted by what Workman said was a flawed definition.

The final piece of legislation being pushed by Ferguson would strengthen rules on ammunition sales.

Louisiana, Nevada and Texas don’t allow violent offenders to buy ammunition and 14 states prohibit the possession of ammunition by people who are prohibited from owning guns, Ferguson said.

He wants to bring Washington in line with those states and require background checks for ammo sales to be sure that felons and other prohibited people can’t buy bullets.

The Alliance for Gun Responsibility also has a legislative wish list. It includes Ferguson’s bills and a few others.

Twenty-seven states and the District of Columbia require safety training for people who want a concealed pistol license. Washington does not require a person to complete a safety course or demonstrate a proficiency with a gun to get a concealed-carry permit.

The group is proposing a measure that would add training to “ensure people carrying concealed weapons know how to safely handle them,” the alliance said in a statement.

They also are bringing back a bill that would allow the State Patrol to destroy confiscated crime guns rather than selling them back to the public.

Washington state allows law enforcement agencies to decide whether to destroy, sell or trade crime-scene firearms. The law is stricter for the State Patrol, which is required to auction off or trade most such guns.

An Associated Press investigation found of the nearly 6,000 firearms used in crimes and then sold by Washington law enforcement agencies since 2010, more than a dozen later became evidence in new investigations.

One of the guns sold by the State Patrol was used by a veteran to commit suicide, the AP found.

Following the AP report, Spokane and King County officials passed measures prohibiting they local law enforcement agencies to sell crime guns. The State Patrol has been seeking this relief for years.

(9) comments

Desert Dweller

Don't get shy folks!! The legislature is going into session for a couple of months. The Squeaky Wheel gets the grease, so make some noise.

Desert Dweller

We have to make noise folks.

Email every State Rep and Senator, Republican or Democrat doesn't matter.

Make noise or they will bury us in our silence.


The Peoples Republic of King County at it again. Do they do anything besides try to take freedoms and look for ways to tax everything they possibly can?

Desert Dweller

Well folks it definitely falls on us to support our position and contact our State Senator and State Reps make sure they are on our side on this.


Article 1, SECTION 24 RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS. The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired...(ignoring the armed employed men part).

Here's the basis for the legal framework in this state. These laws which limit law abiding gun owners are constitutional. If this crap passes, I will flat ass move out of this state.

Desert Dweller

It never ceases to amaze me that the Liberals think that the lawless element will obey any law that they pass.

They are merely inconveniencing law abiding citizens, and possibly making them less safe with their restrictions on the law abiding leaving them at a disadvantage to the lawless.

Common sense is a flower that does not grow in everybody's garden.


You all know my stance on this, so I will let you have your pity party all by yourselves. Knock yourselves out.

Desert Dweller

Thank you


yeah we know your stance of taking no stance unless it affects you directly.. It is sad though that you (and others) think law abiding citizens (99.999999999% of gun purchases) should not have something because you don't like it.

But when you (and others) are confronted with facts and comparisons you have absolutely no point or argument other than to say 1 of 3 things.. #1 Why do you need a gun and #2 is Why should you have a gun that the military uses.. and #3 is Guns can kill people.

BUUUTTTT when I compare the YOUR pickup and SUVs to hold the same argument that THEY KILL people in hugely larger numbers than the 300 to 400 people that MIGHT be killed by these firearms and you again say, "well that's different".. NOT to take into affect how you do NOT need a pickup that spews large amount of poisonous gases which causes MILLIONS of people to have health problems that lead to death.. NOT to mention the HUNDREDS of MILLIONS of people that might be displaced as climate change changes the landscapes of the planet... ALL because of self centered people like YOU only caring about yourself but then for some reason you THINK you need to care about my right to own a gun that I just enjoy shooting and challenging myself to see if I can hit that object..

My gun causes a lot less harm than your lifestyle does BuB sooo why don't you worry about something that actually matters because my guns have not ever hurt anyone.. Something that you cannot say about the comparisons..

Stop being a hypocrite!!!

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.