vote

OLYMPIA, Wash. (AP) — Washington voters have narrowly rejected a ballot measure seeking to reinstate the use of affirmative action in state employment, contracting and admission to public colleges and universities.

Referendum 88 was rejected Tuesday by 50.4% of voters with a margin of just over 13,000 votes. Counties in vote-by-mail Washington had been updating their tallies daily since last week’s election.

The measure asked voters whether they want to approve or reject Initiative 1000, which was passed by the Legislature in April. I-1000 amended current statutes that prohibit state government from discriminating against or giving preferential treatment to individuals or groups based on race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in public employment, public education, or public contracting.

The measure would have allowed the consideration of being part of a minority group to be a contributing factor for a qualified applicant. Along with race, sex, and ethnicity, the measure allowed for consideration of age, disability and honorable discharge or military status. It would have prohibited using factors such as race as the sole qualifier and banned mandatory quotas but would have allowed state agencies and public colleges and universities to establish diversity goals and timelines. A commission would have been created to direct and oversee compliance.

I-1000 was supposed to take effect in July but was put on hold after opponents collected enough signatures to force a referendum.

The measure was losing in all but four of the state’s 39 counties, but strong support in King County — the state’s most populous — had kept the margin close.

Washington is one of eight states — including California, Florida and Oklahoma — that ban affirmative action in state government and public colleges and universities, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Washington’s ban came with 1998′s Initiative 200, which was approved by 58% of voters.

A 2017 opinion by the state attorney general said that I-200 “does not categorically prohibit all race- and sex-conscious actions regarding state contracting,” stating it only prohibits situations where race or gender is used to select a less qualified contractor over a more qualified one. Proponents of I-1000 said the amendment to the law was still needed to clarify what state agencies and universities can do to diversify their workforce.

Opponents of the change argued the measure would have led to even more inequality.

(17) comments

Desert Dweller

We are in the 21st century now, we have had a black president of the USA, Washington state has had 2 women governors, there are many LGBT elected officials serving across the nation. Time to grow up and move on.

Desert Dweller

Yes, a meritocracy where the most capable are selected for their abilities.

Cheburashka

And all women can get a job as the tooth fairy.

Desert Dweller

Why such a low opinion of women?

Cheburashka

Why such an inability to understand sarcasm?

Desert Dweller

Probably comes from all the women I hired as supervisors over the years.

Cheburashka

Sarcasm on...And there's NO implied prejudice in that statement...sarcasm off.

Desert Dweller

I don't think you are capable of turning the sarcasm off. So little faith in people.

Cheburashka

I say, with no sarcasm at all, that anyone who makes blanket statements about "all the women" he or she has hired is certainly guilty of stereotyping and probably of prejudice.

Desert Dweller

You are more than welcome to your opinion.

Desert Dweller

Why such a low opinion of women?

JohnQPublic

The most qualified individual, based on skills matching the requirements, is who should always get selected.

Cheburashka

Unless they're gay, or the wrong religion, or the wrong political party, or the wrong race...

Desert Dweller

What does that have to do with their qualifications?

Cheburashka

People hiring often overlook qualifications if they are PREJUDICED against the applicant.

Desert Dweller

I hired and fired people for 30 years. I always picked the most qualified person for the job because I wanted the best result for the company. Any other approach is counter productive.

Cheburashka

As was Jim Crow, or homophobic law... nevertheless, they existed. Custom dictates that we do things that are often counterproductive. Affirmative action is an attempt to change customs. It's been shown to have a positive effect, but prejudice is still a factor in much hiring.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.